Your own agents in production, contained — and proof of every move for the ones you didn't write.
Your in-house agents run in a sealed box — a bad action can't reach your data, and every move is logged and signed. Agents you didn't write? One signed run is tamper-evident proof of exactly what they did. Auditor, procurement, regulator: same evidence.
Your own agents, contained.
The fear isn't a hacker. It's your own agent hitting an input it never saw in testing — and deleting data, leaking a secret, or touching prod.
It does what it decides — not what you reviewed.
You wrote the agent — not every action it takes. On an untested input it can make a call you never intended: drop a table, log a secret, hit prod under load. You find out in the incident channel.
A bad action can't reach your real systems.
Run it inside the sealed runtime. It touches only what you allowed; the instant it reaches past that, it stops. Every action logged and signed — a review becomes a question with an answer.
The liability shift — before and after.
Your name is on it. The evidence isn't.
Something goes wrong — a leak, an unauthorized action, a compliance review — and the question lands: what evidence do you have? An AI-judge verdict is non-deterministic and gets thrown out. Manual logs can be edited. “We believe it was contained” is not a compliance answer.
In defense, fintech, healthcare, and public sector, the answer you can't give blocks everything.
Mathematical proof. Deterministic. Signed. Verifiable offline.
One signed run produces a tamper-evident Trust Receipt: every secret that did or didn't leave the box, every network destination, every action — signed by a key held in a separate locked process that a full Probity compromise cannot forge.
Deterministic: same input, same result, no model in the proof path. Your auditor re-verifies it offline with a public key. If the agent did exactly what was authorized, the evidence says so — in terms a regulator accepts.
The window is closing.
The EU AI Act's general rules took effect on 2 August 2026. Its Article 12 rule — high-risk AI must log its events on its own — becomes mandatory on 2 December 2027. The EU pushed that date back because the tooling was not ready. FedRAMP and DoD buyers already ask for tamper-evident AI audit trails. And Fortune 500 security teams are adding AI-agent evidence to their vendor questionnaires right now.
The question is whether you have it before the conversation stalls.
One run unblocks procurement. The runtime closes the ongoing audit.
Run the gate before the agent touches production: the same execution that returns your pass/fail emits a signed evidence bundle mapped to every framework your auditor asks for. One run, ten regimes.
Then keep it in the sealed runtime: every action gated, signed, frozen on a catch. One run passes today's audit; the always-on tamper-evident log keeps you passing tomorrow.
One signed run. Ten regimes.
One Trust Receipt maps into all ten frameworks through OSCAL — the format your auditor's tools already ingest. Verdict, every catch, exactly what ran. Re-checkable offline with nothing but a public key.
NIST 800-53 Rev 5
✓ emittedThe US government's master catalog of security and privacy controls (built by its standards agency, NIST) that IT systems must implement.
It's the checklist auditors grade you against; your tools must map to it to win federal and regulated-enterprise deals.
Emitted, signed, and re-verifiable today.
The US government's master catalog of security and privacy controls (built by its standards agency, NIST) that IT systems must implement.
It's the checklist auditors grade you against; your tools must map to it to win federal and regulated-enterprise deals.
Emitted, signed, and re-verifiable today.
Shift the liability. Unblock the deal.
One signed run produces the evidence bundle. Your auditor holds it and never has to trust Probity. The liability follows the evidence — not the assertion.